Coaching Outside of Your Area of Expertise

Once upon a time, I went home crying after trying and failing to understand a teacher’s doctoral dissertation in social science. I'd been assigned to work with him since he was a new teacher. But I was intimidated by his content area and even more intimidated by his research. As a former science teacher, I felt completely out of my depth and convinced I'd never be able to coach him effectively. So I took a mopey half day and had a good cry about my inadequacy.

So not helpful. But that was then.

I share this because I know I'm not alone (maybe in the intensity) in experiencing strong feelings when faced with coaching outside of my areas of expertise. I've heard it from lots of instructional coaches, whether about the prospect of coaching in a different content area, grade level, or both. The fear and trepidation are real, and so are the stakes, both for our confidence and for the students and teachers counting on our support.

And if this is you, I want you to know that:

1. It's normal to feel nervous, and

2. You can do this…but there are some steps you need to take.

   
   

Two Extremes

When coaching outside of what's familiar to us, it's common to swing between two unhelpful extremes. On one end, there's the "good teaching is good teaching" crowd, assuming that strong pedagogical moves translate seamlessly across all content areas and age groups without nuance. On the other end, there's the paralysis that can come from wanting to first become a content or developmental expert before feeling like we can coach effectively. Both approaches set us up to fail. 

Using generalized, one-size-fits-all approaches can contradict research-based practices for specific age groups, linguistic backgrounds, neurodivergence, cultural context, or expectations for instruction in different content areas. For example, I once heard an administrator tell a secondary math teacher that they should show their I Do, We Do, You Do in their lesson plan, while simultaneously demanding that the teacher use the adopted curriculum, which was problem-based. Those two approaches are based on entirely different views of the role of the teacher and how a lesson should be structured. 

The second option – needing to become experts first, sends us down rabbit holes that leave us feeling overwhelmed, underprepared, and stuck. Hello, dissertation fail. We cannot aim to out-expert someone who has been teaching a grade we’ve never taught for ten years.

The sweet spot? Learning enough to be a thoughtful partner without attempting to become the expert of all the things.

So, how do we do it? I've coached and led programs in just about every content area and grade K-12. If I were starting over, here's the advice I'd give myself.

Finding Your Footing

Here are some key moves that have helped me find that sweet spot:

DO: Start with the standards.

Unpack what students are actually supposed to know and be able to do at this grade level. If you're working with Common Core math, for example, understanding that "rigor" specifically means conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, AND application and what each looks like can help you spot when a teacher or student is overemphasizing memorizing tricks and procedures at the expense of building number sense. There are many places to learn about the standards of a course. Watch the webinar. Read the articles. This investment in time will provide ongoing returns in understanding the essentials.

DON'T: Skip the instructional framework.

In the US, State Departments of Ed define what effective teaching looks like for each content area and through the grades. These are often spelled out in instructional framework documents. Study them to get the balcony-level understanding of what things should look like on the ground. 

DO: Lean on high-quality instructional materials.

Well-designed curricular materials embed pedagogical content knowledge that you can learn from. Resources like EdReports ratings, materials from professional associations for teaching specific content areas, and some State or local Depts of Ed can help you identify high quality instructional materials if your school doesn’t already have them. Study the intro and overview to understand how the materials are organized, where to find the resources for differentiation, and how to internalize the course, units, and lessons. 

DON'T: Confuse training needs with coaching needs.

If a teacher needs to learn new content knowledge or pedagogical approaches, that might require targeted training, not just coaching. Know when to recommend additional learning opportunities, particularly if it goes beyond the scope (or needs to be at a more accelerated pace) than what you can provide through coaching. When I was coaching a teacher with knowledge gaps for his middle school science class, he actually needed to just go study the unit content before our meetings. When I was supporting a teacher who had never taught a structured literacy curriculum, coaching wasn't going to be enough. She needed training, not just on the curriculum, but on the science of reading. When training hasn't been available, I've been able to recommend videos and webinars, and work with admin to get pull-out days, and customize our own "PD day" together. When an entire elementary department needed to build their skills around teaching math with visual models, I designed a hands-on day where we learned and taught each other how to use arrays, tape diagrams, double number lines, hanger models, bar models, and part-part-whole models. I can tell you that this biology-teacher-turned-coach wasn't the expert in these things, but I could distinguish when an issue went beyond an individual teacher needing coaching, and I knew there were resources available that I could curate to help.

DO: Make time for learning.

If you're a generalist coach or will be working primarily outside your content area, put regular studying time on your calendar. Whether it's AI tutoring you through content basics, reading key texts, listening to podcasts, or attending webinars, building learning time into your work schedule will support your ongoing development in manageable chunks.

DON'T: Forget that cognitive science applies everywhere.

Understanding how people learn (from memory consolidation to transfer) supports coaching across all content areas. This foundation helps you ask better questions and spot learning challenges regardless of the subject. An understanding of learning science helps us guide teachers through questions about what to do when students have experienced disrupted and/or unfinished learning, when and how to bridge knowledge gaps, and how to ensure they're doing the cognitive work of the lesson. 

DO: Frame your role clearly.

The goal isn’t to be the content expert, but skillful at coaching. Your job is to support goal-setting, help clarify success metrics grounded in student outcomes, support strong lesson planning, analysis of and response to student work, and asking skillful questions that promote reflection and growth. The amount of stuff you have to learn in someone else's grade level and content area is in service of these core functions of your role. When we can keep that distinction clear, we can calibrate what’s essential to know in order to be a supportive thought partner.

DON'T: Pretend you know more than you do.

Teachers can spot coaching advice that misses the mark. Instead, be transparent about what you're learning and invite them to teach you about their content while you support their instructional growth. 

Making It Work

When you approach learning this way, you remain impactful and maintain your credibility while strengthening relationships and continually learning.

In my coaching career I've had to learn enough about K-8 child development (when my experience was high school) to structured phonics, knowledge-rich ELA curricula, US History (having been raised outside the US), and even enough about the structure of Mandarin to coach effectively, despite knowing exactly two words when I started.

In each case, doing just-enough learning allowed me to contribute thoughtfully without suggesting approaches that were out of alignment with best practices. It helped me spot when a 7th grade math teacher needed to move beyond procedural tricks to build conceptual understanding with number lines. It enabled me to recognize when a high school English rubric was actually below grade level. It allowed me to support a 2nd grade teacher's decision-making around curriculum pacing adjustments.

The goal isn't content expertise. It's coaching competence. Learn enough to ask the right questions, recognize quality instruction, and support teachers in making decisions aligned with how students learn best in their content area.

And if you find yourself pouring over someone's dissertation before your first meeting? Take a step back, a few deep breaths, and remember the learning you actually need to do: what's the student baseline data, what's the teacher's vision of success for themselves and their students, how's the quality of that summative assessment? And yes, do you know the balcony-level fundamentals to be able to provide valuable feedback?

These days, if I were assigned that humanities teacher with the fancy dissertation? I'd skip reading it entirely and focus on the student work, the standards, and the curriculum. And I'd probably sleep better too.

What content areas have pushed you outside your comfort zone? How do you approach learning just-enough to coach effectively without getting overwhelmed?

Want more weekly coaching insights? Subscribe to Problem of Practice for practical strategies and reflections delivered to your inbox.